|
"We found that
there was a cause-and-effect relationship between the two; that it
was impossible to maintain a loyal customer base without a base of
loyal employees; and that the best employees prefer to work for
companies that deliver the kind of superior value that builds
customer loyalty... building loyalty has in fact become the acid
test of leadership."
— Frederick Reichheld, The Loyalty Effect and Loyalty Rules
For most organizations, the goal of improving customer service
levels is an article of faith. And so it should be, because
there's an overwhelming body of research to show that building
customer loyalty has a major impact on profitability. In fact,
according to one study—based
on 46,000 business-to-business surveys—a
"totally satisfied" customer contributes 2.6 times as much revenue
as a "somewhat satisfied" customer.
Clearly, there are significant benefits to be realized from
trying to improve an organization's service/quality. And that's
why managers devote so much time and money to training programs
that "instruct" employees on the specifics of dealing with
customers. What these managers don't understand, however, is that
such attempts are largely cosmetic. Real improvements in customer
service start with providing superior service and support to the
employees themselves.
All too often, this misunderstanding results in sending staff
through "smile training," issuing edicts to be more courteous, or
teaching them how to handle dissatisfied customers. In the
meantime, processes and systems don't support frontline servers.
Irritants and issues that reduce morale are swept aside as
excuses. An airline manager attempted to address the problem of
declining customer satisfaction by issuing a directive urging
staff to smile and be nicer to passengers. A flight attendant's
response showed how that manager just didn't get it: "We're
smiling in spite of the fact that we're doing our job one, two, or
three flight attendants short, with equipment that often doesn't
work properly and with a product that has deteriorated."
Harvard professor and author Rosabeth Moss Kanter likens this
type of change-effort to putting lipstick on a bulldog. Rather
than deal with an ugly and nasty problem (my apologies to bulldog
owners), the manager makes superficial changes and tries to pass
them off as real improvements. The result of this cosmetic effort
is, as Kanter observes, that "the bulldog's appearance hasn't
improved, but now it's really angry."
Taking an organization from good to great customer service
ultimately depends on the people who provide that service. It can
only happen through the volunteerism—the
willingness to go beyond what is merely required—of
people who serve on the frontlines. Going from ordinary to
extraordinary performance happens through the discretionary
efforts of frontline staff deciding to make the thousands of "moment(s)
of truth" (any time a customer interacts with the company in
person, by phone, or electronically), they manage every day as
positively as they possibly can. This enthusiasm, loyalty, or
devotion can't be forced on people. It only happens through a
"culture of commitment," where frontline people reflect to the
outside the intense pride and ownership they are experiencing on
the inside.
Here are some examples of the research showing the connection
between internal and external service:
- The best predictor of customer satisfaction among workplace
attributes is what Vanderbilt professor Roland Rust calls
service climate: "those attributes of overall workplace climate
that characterize how well equipped employees are to deliver
customer service, such as the adequacy of resources and
equipment and job skills development."
- For every one percent increase in internal service climate
there is a two percent increase in revenue.
- In cardiac care units where nurses' moods were depressed,
patient death rates were four times higher than in comparable
units.
- Cornell's School of Hotel Administration found that
employees' emotional commitment and sense of identity with the
company is a key factor in providing excellent service.
- A study of call centers conducted by The Radclyffe Group
found that "satisfied contact center employees make for
satisfied and loyal customers...customers decide whether or not
to make future purchasing decisions with a company, or to
recommend its services to others, as a direct result of their
experiences with a contact center representative...key
indicators of contact center representative satisfaction include
relationships with co-workers and management, job challenges,
and frequency of development or training opportunities...sense
of pride with their job and within the overall company."
A company's external customer service is only as strong as the
company's internal leadership, and the culture of commitment that
this leadership creates. To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, our
service or brand promise can't fool all of our customers all of
the time. If the service messages are out of step with what's
ultimately experienced by customers, marketing dollars are wasted.
And customer dissatisfaction rises right along with staff
turnover. Scott Cook, founder of Intuit (creators of Quicken
software), puts it this way; "Great brands are earned, not bought.
Customer experience is where brand is built, not in the marketing
budget."
Excerpted from Jim's bestseller,
The Leader's Digest: Timeless Principles for Team and
Organization Success. View the book's unique format and
content, Introduction and Chapter One, and feedback at
www.theleadersdigest.com. This book is a companion
book to Growing the Distance: Timeless Principles for Personal,
Career, and Family Success. Jim Clemmer is an internationally
acclaimed keynote speaker, workshop/retreat leader, and management
team developer on leadership, change, customer focus, culture,
teams, and personal growth. His Web site is at
www.clemmer.net. |